- Home
- Councils
- City of Wolverhampton
- Wards
- Ettingshall South & Spring Vale
Electoral wardE05014845
Ettingshall South & Spring Vale ward, City of Wolverhampton
Ettingshall South & Spring Vale is one of 20 electoral wards of Wolverhampton City Council (West Midlands). At the 2021 Census it had 13,075 residents in 5,075 households — 3,993 people per km², the 9th largest of the council's wards by population. It lies in the Wolverhampton South East constituency.
Residents, 202113,075council ward average 13,186
Households5,0752.58 residents per household
Density3,993/ km²about 3.27 km² · City of Wolverhampton 3,798
Aged 65+19.2%City of Wolverhampton: 16.4% · under 16: 19.0%
Census 2021
Age of residents
0–45.2% · 679
5–96.0% · 785
10–157.8% · 1,025
16–195.1% · 661
20–245.9% · 773
25–3411.9% · 1,557
35–4919.2% · 2,516
50–6419.7% · 2,572
65–749.6% · 1,261
75–846.4% · 836
85+3.2% · 419
Car or van availability
Share of households.
No car or van23.8% · 1,205
1 car or van39.6% · 2,009
2 cars or vans26.4% · 1,339
3 or more10.3% · 520
Census 2021
Housing tenure
Share of households; City of Wolverhampton overall: 55.0% owned, 25.2% social rented, 19.0% private rented.
Owned outright37.7% · 1,912
With mortgage27.6% · 1,402
Shared ownership0.2% · 11
Social rented21.3% · 1,082
Private rented12.7% · 646
Lives rent free0.4% · 22
Type of home
Detached house16.2% · 822
Semi-detached house57.3% · 2,908
Terraced house8.0% · 404
Purpose-built flat17.4% · 885
Converted house0.3% · 16
Other conversion0.0% · 1
Above shop / office0.7% · 35
Caravan, mobile0.0% · 1
Electoral geography
Ward facts
- Ward code (GSS)
E05014845- Council
- Wolverhampton City Council
- Constituency
- Wolverhampton South East
- Region
- West Midlands
- Density rank in council
- 11 of 20
Census 2021: Office for National Statistics via Nomis (TS001, TS006, TS007B, TS041, TS044, TS045, TS054) · ward lookups: ONS Open Geography Portal · Open Government Licence v3.0This ward was drawn after the 2021 Census: figures are built up from the 8 census areas (LSOAs) that ONS best-fits to it, so they are close estimates.